Logo

Why do Argentinians use "vos" instead of "tú" in informal speech?

10.06.2025 02:15

Why do Argentinians use "vos" instead of "tú" in informal speech?

¹

In late Latin (Imperial and Christian period), speakers began to distinguish between a distance (or “polite”) form and an intimate (or “informal”) form. In the distance form, i.e., when addressing a person “of respect”, the pronoun vōs was used, whose main meaning was that of the second person plural (‘you, ye’). This situation was still retained in Old Spanish: tú was the intimate pronoun of the second singular and vos was the distance pronoun of the second singular and the pronoun of the second person plural. Later, however, the function of the distance vos moved closer to the function of the intimate tú, until in the “Siglo de Oro” (~1550–1660), tú and vos were almost synonymous (for instance, in Tirso de Molina in whose opus it is difficult to associate tú and vos with different functions). For this reason, the second-person-singular form vos, which didn’t mark distance any more, was often replaced by the formulation vuestra merced ‘Your Grace’, whose contracted form usted was continuously habitualised as the new second-person-singular distance form. Likewise, the plural pronoun vos was replaced by vosotros (literally: ‘you others’), so that the only remaining function of vos was that of a second-person-singular intimate pronoun, alongside tú:

verbal: only the verbal forms are based on the original plural: tú cantás, tú querés.

Is it normal to hate my dog, but feel too guilty to get rid of him?

Voseo means that the allocution of the second person singular is not based on Latin TŪ ‘you_{sg.}’, but on VŌS ‘you_{pl.}’. Voseo can appear in three different forms:

The allocutive or pronominal system of American Spanish is very varied. You don’t only have voseo (which can be complete, pronominal and verbal), but there are also ustedeo, tuteo¹, as well as tripartite systems. The distribution of these systems varies according to region and register. In fact, also the use of voseo is not limited to Argentinian Spanish.

Romanian features a highly complex allocutive system that includes, at least virtually, four different address pronouns for the second person singular: tu, dumneata, dumneavoastră and domnia voastră (which, however, is hardly used any more, if not in an ironic function) and also three degrees of distance for the second person plural.

It has been said that people with ADHD can often hyperfocus. Can that be an advantage?

In Brazilian Portuguese, você was conventionalised as a second-person-singular intimate pronoun. That is, in a certain way, in Brazil prevails what in the Spanish context is called ustedeo.

Tuteo means that both the pronoun and the verbal form go back to the Latin second person singular.

pronominal: only the pronoun vos is based on the Latin plural, while the verbal form is that of the Latin second person singular: vos cantas, vos quieres.

Is it possible for sisters to have different skin, hair colours, and hair types? E.g. hair= wavy, afro, straight, curly, black, brown, blonde, red. Skin colour: brown, peach, light brown and more.

Subsequently, in European Spanish, the opposition tú—usted (2nd person singular intimate—distant), vosotros—ustedes (2nd person plural intimate—distant) was consolidated, also by grammatical prescription. American Spanish, however, lacked such instances defining clear linguistic rules, so that regional variants were “fed” by the manifold inventory containing both tuteo and voseo, which could develop freely and far from normative influence, just as the corresponding verbal forms could develop naturally. Besides, in Latin America, ustedes ‘you_{pl.}’ is the only second-person-plural pronoun; that is, there is no vosotros in America.

Ustedeo means that the original distance pronoun usted is used in intimate contexts, so it has the same function as tú in European Spanish and of vos in Argentinian Spanish.

As for the question of why a certain system is habitualised in a certain variant of the language, I do not know if it is possible to give exact explanations. In fact, the allocutive system is generally very varied, since it is not only a question of grammar sensu stricto, but is also part of pragmatics; that is, social or even political issues also contribute to its evolution. For example:

New COVID variant could come with extremely painful symptom - PennLive.com

The Italian distance pronoun is lei ‘~she’. In this case, it was not a nominal syntagm to be conventionalised (like vuestra merced > usted in Spanish), but the reference to it; i.e. lei ‘she’ refers to vossignoria < vostra signoria ‘your lordship’. In the dialects, however, the use of voi (< VŌS) prevails, and for instance in the colloquial Italian of Naples there is also a tripartite system (tu, voi, lei).

second person plural intimate: vosotros.

second person singular distance: usted.

Hi everybody! I have been looking at posts on narcs and narc abuse on here and if has really helped me out a lot. I am currently struggling with my situation and need some advice/support. I met a narc last year, everything seemed to good to be true. Love bombing, always texting calling and taking me on dates. Everything changed when someone warned me about him out in public in front of him and who he is. This caused a conflict with us and the love bombing seized. he would tell me that everything is okay and i can come and talk. He would set a time limit on me and kick me out after that. he would then text me like everything was fine and we hung out again and after that he completely ghosted me for one week. He came back and texted me a week later laughing about the ghosting and acting like nothing had happened. he continued to text me ( not like in the beginning) make plans with me, then on the day of the plans he would just ghost me. One day he would act interested the next silence. i contacted him a month later and he acted like nothing happened. He was on a vacation and sent me a picture of another woman ( someone he allegedly met on the trip) to strike a reaction but i never gave him one. After the trip he came to my place and was extremely rude, accusing me of going on dates with a bunch of men. The next day he accused me of being an alcoholic and that he wanted nothing to do with me but said well maybe we can be "friends" then ghosted me i assumed at this point it was over and i would never hear from him again. He contacted me on the holiday a month later acting like everything was great. We ended up hanging out a month or so later and when we hung out it went well, i thought things were going in the right direction. after we hung out.. silence. I would try to text him and if he replied it would be very short then he just stopped replying. He ghosted me for almost three months. I thought he was done this time and of course he popped up again like nothing happened. At this point i was getting sick of if so i questioned him as to why he dissapeared and always does this. Of course he had some sob story about a injury and family member dying of cancer. I felt pity for him and he gave me an apology.. so i took him back stupidly. things seemed to be going smooth for a couple months, of course until his family member died and his injury got better he never contacted me and was distant. Menawhile, i was there for him during the difficult time for him. He lied to me about the funeral and never wanted to chat. I was chasing him and he would always claim nothing was wrong but when i said i thought he used me when he was down he could not handle it and would always tell me he didnt care and to go away. I would get so upset i would try texting him to work it out he would barelt respond and if he did he would not be nice about it. we did hang out a couple times after that, he would ignore me after. One day i was like hey i think you are seeing someone else, and i was like well ixam seeing someone so no problem if you are he said " buy bye good luck with your new guy stop contacting me" i was devastated and tried to get into contact with him for weeks then i just gave up and accepted it was over. He ended up contacting me a month later acting like everything was fine. He wanted to go out and have drinks i told him i would. He and i both seemed to have a great time. He ends up ignoring me again. I kept texting him trying to figure out what was wrong. He kept saying everything was fine and i said ok can we hang out again? He said maybe i was like why? He just kept saying maybe … our last conversation we had… i said what is wrong ? He said nothing is wrong everything is fine. I asked him why he keeps saying maybe. He said " maybe but i dont want to see you right now" i said why? He saix " im just not feeling it, if i wanted to date i would" i said why did you contact me less then a week ago wanting to go out? He said i didnt.. even though he did. So i said should i just move on or what? He said whatever you want to do. So i said that he was really confusing me and asked him if he had anything more to say before i move on? My messages were turning green so i panicked he blocked me and reacted irrationally. I said " omg did you block me? My messages are not going through. Even texted him on my work phone asking what was up. And called him twice ( please dont judge me i know it is pathetic i never was this type of girl before him) so he replied and said " Ok I'll block you now" then immedietly blocked me. He has never blocked me before since I have met him he will just ghost. Is this ths final discard aka " grand finale? Did i just push him too far? this has upset me so much its hard to even function.

second person singular intimate: tú ~ vos.

complete: both the pronoun and the verb are based on the Latin plural forms, e.g. vos cantás ‘you sing’, vos querés ‘you want’.

That is, the allocutive or pronominal system tends to be unstable and shows substantial differences also between related languages or between different dialects, also because the track of grammaticalisation is quite “open”. Therefore, it is not surprising that also in American Spanish there are several realisations of the allocutive system, even though I think it is difficult to verify why a certain system developed precisely in a certain place.

RFK Jr. looks to fast track rare disease drug approvals (updated) - Seeking Alpha

second person plural distance: ustedes.

The underlying process closely resembles the one that led to the replacement of thou art and thou hast with you are and you have in modern English.